Invalid locale ID

Getting the following error in SQL 2005 :
Msg 7696, Level 16, State 10, Line 1
Invalid locale ID was specified. Please verify that the locale ID is correct
and corresponding language resource has been installed.
Well my question is : Is it possible to install a language or do I have to
accept the languages installed. My desired language is danish (locale id
1030) and it is not installed. I can see this by querying
sys.fulltext_languages. Well if it's not possible to install the language
then it is quite useless because I want to use the rules for the danish
language not sweduisk, english or german. It's not a new feature for me when
it is possible to choose language using Contains and Freetext if my desired
language isn't there. But here is the funny part. The language was present
in the Beta Version. What has happened ? Is Denmark wiped of the map since
then ?
Anybody knows ?
If it's not possible then let me know because then I can't use fulltext in
2005 either.
Regards
Bobby Henningsen
Bobby wrote on Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:19:30 +0100:

> Getting the following error in SQL 2005 :
> Msg 7696, Level 16, State 10, Line 1
> Invalid locale ID was specified. Please verify that the locale ID is
> correct and corresponding language resource has been installed.
> Well my question is : Is it possible to install a language or do I have to
> accept the languages installed. My desired language is danish (locale id
> 1030) and it is not installed. I can see this by querying
> sys.fulltext_languages. Well if it's not possible to install the language
> then it is quite useless because I want to use the rules for the danish
> language not sweduisk, english or german. It's not a new feature for me
> when it is possible to choose language using Contains and Freetext if my
> desired language isn't there. But here is the funny part. The language was
> present in the Beta Version. What has happened ? Is Denmark wiped of the
> map since then ?
> Anybody knows ?
> If it's not possible then let me know because then I can't use fulltext in
> 2005 either.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908441/en-us
As of the Sept CTP version of SQL Server 2005 the Danish word breaker is not
installed, along with some other languages, as these are 3rd party supplied
and not from Microsoft. The above link has information on how to add the
missing languages to the CTP, which I guess should work on the final release
too. However, the actual entries needed to add to the registry are missing
for the Danish breaker, so you might need to contact MS to get them to
update this article. There is a danlr.dll in the Binn dir in SQL Server 2005
(at least on my server there is), so it looks like the file ships with SQL
Server 2005, it just doesn't get enabled.
Dan
|||Hi Dan,
thanx a bunch. It works fine. Well had to restart the machine (hmm maby
reatrting the services would do but my VPC kind of "died"). But following
the article worked just fine. So now I'm much much happier So we can
conclude that it works in RTM. The dll's are there.
Regards
Bobby Henningsen
"Daniel Crichton" <msnews@.worldofspack.co.uk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:uY410ZaIGHA.3120@.TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Bobby wrote on Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:19:30 +0100:
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908441/en-us
> As of the Sept CTP version of SQL Server 2005 the Danish word breaker is
> not installed, along with some other languages, as these are 3rd party
> supplied and not from Microsoft. The above link has information on how to
> add the missing languages to the CTP, which I guess should work on the
> final release too. However, the actual entries needed to add to the
> registry are missing for the Danish breaker, so you might need to contact
> MS to get them to update this article. There is a danlr.dll in the Binn
> dir in SQL Server 2005 (at least on my server there is), so it looks like
> the file ships with SQL Server 2005, it just doesn't get enabled.
> Dan
>

Invalid column name Ploeg.

When i try to execute i receive following error:

Msg 207, Level 16, State 1, Procedure WedstrijdDeelnemersSelectAllMPNietGoedgekeurd, Line 85

Invalid column name 'Ploeg'.

I dont really see whats wrong with the select... it works fine in the 2 first parts of the querry

ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[WedstrijdDeelnemersSelectAllMPNietGoedgekeurd]-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here@.WedstrijdIDintASBEGIN-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from-- interfering with SELECT statements.SET NOCOUNT ON;...UNIONSELECTdbo.fncGetPersoonNaam(L.PersoonID,0)as Persoon,'Ploeg: ' + WDPI.Ploegas TypeInschrijving,WDPIL.LidClubID,WT.Omschrijvingas WedstrijdType,C.Omschrijvingas Categorie,WDC.WedstrijdDetailID,WDC.IDas WedstrijdDetailCategorieID,WDPI.IDas TypeInschrijvingIDFROMWedstrijd WINNERJOIN WedstrijdDetail WDON W.ID = WD.WedstrijdIDINNERJOIN WedstrijdType WTON WD.WedstrijdTypeID = WT.IDINNERJOIN WedstrijdDetailCategorie WDCON WD.ID = WDC.WedstrijdDetailIDINNERJOIN Categorie CON WDC.CategorieID = C.IDINNERJOIN WedstrijdDetailPloegInschrijving WDPION WDC.ID = WDPI.WedstrijdDetailCategorieIDINNERJOIN WedstrijdDetailPloegInschrijvingLid WDPILON WDPIL.WedstrijdDetailPloegInschrijvingID = WDPI.ID...

END

forget it, someone updated the database and removed the column...

Intra-query parallelism causes deadlock

Has anyone seen the following message and if so how did you go about resolving the problem?

Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 20
Intra-query parallelism caused your server command (process ID #15) to deadlock. Rerun the query without intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).Can anyone give me a low down on Intra-query parallelism and why a quad server will get this error?
Jim

Originally posted by Deddens
Has anyone seen the following message and if so how did you go about resolving the problem?

Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 20
Intra-query parallelism caused your server command (process ID #15) to deadlock. Rerun the query without intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).

Intra-query parallelism

I'm saw this error for the first time this AM from a process which runs
nightly:
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 1 Intra-query parallelism caused
your server command (process ID #55) to deadlock. Rerun the query without
intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).
I read KB 837983 "You may receive error message 8650 when you run a query
that uses intra-query parallelism" and KB 315662 "FIX: Parallel query may
encounter undetected deadlock with itself" referenced by that article, as
well as the article mentioned by a MVP in this group in a message dated
07/26/2007. I also read up on Degrees of parallelism in BOL. What isn't
clear to me is, what exactly is meant by parallel "query" execution? Is this
referring to a single "query" being executed by multiple threads
simultaneously, or multiple threads executing separate "queries" (even
though the statements may be identical)? If it is the former then I see no
reason why I shouldn't go ahead and disable it, since only this one process
which runs after hours has generated the error. If it is the latter, then
that would seem to indicate that disabling parallel query execution
effectively would make my four CPU server a one CPU server. What I have read
seems to suggest the former, but nowhere is it stated outright. Can anyone
clear this up for me?
Intra-query parallelism uses multiple threads to service a single query.
You can just add the OPTION (MAXDOP 1) to your SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
statement to suppress parallelism for that one query.
Tom
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Ron Hinds" <billg@.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OViL%23ns2HHA.4184@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
I'm saw this error for the first time this AM from a process which runs
nightly:
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 1 Intra-query parallelism caused
your server command (process ID #55) to deadlock. Rerun the query without
intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).
I read KB 837983 "You may receive error message 8650 when you run a query
that uses intra-query parallelism" and KB 315662 "FIX: Parallel query may
encounter undetected deadlock with itself" referenced by that article, as
well as the article mentioned by a MVP in this group in a message dated
07/26/2007. I also read up on Degrees of parallelism in BOL. What isn't
clear to me is, what exactly is meant by parallel "query" execution? Is this
referring to a single "query" being executed by multiple threads
simultaneously, or multiple threads executing separate "queries" (even
though the statements may be identical)? If it is the former then I see no
reason why I shouldn't go ahead and disable it, since only this one process
which runs after hours has generated the error. If it is the latter, then
that would seem to indicate that disabling parallel query execution
effectively would make my four CPU server a one CPU server. What I have read
seems to suggest the former, but nowhere is it stated outright. Can anyone
clear this up for me?

Intra-query parallelism

I'm saw this error for the first time this AM from a process which runs
nightly:
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 1 Intra-query parallelism caused
your server command (process ID #55) to deadlock. Rerun the query without
intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).
I read KB 837983 "You may receive error message 8650 when you run a query
that uses intra-query parallelism" and KB 315662 "FIX: Parallel query may
encounter undetected deadlock with itself" referenced by that article, as
well as the article mentioned by a MVP in this group in a message dated
07/26/2007. I also read up on Degrees of parallelism in BOL. What isn't
clear to me is, what exactly is meant by parallel "query" execution? Is this
referring to a single "query" being executed by multiple threads
simultaneously, or multiple threads executing separate "queries" (even
though the statements may be identical)? If it is the former then I see no
reason why I shouldn't go ahead and disable it, since only this one process
which runs after hours has generated the error. If it is the latter, then
that would seem to indicate that disabling parallel query execution
effectively would make my four CPU server a one CPU server. What I have read
seems to suggest the former, but nowhere is it stated outright. Can anyone
clear this up for me?Intra-query parallelism uses multiple threads to service a single query.
You can just add the OPTION (MAXDOP 1) to your SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
statement to suppress parallelism for that one query.
Tom
----
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Ron Hinds" <billg@.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OViL%23ns2HHA.4184@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
I'm saw this error for the first time this AM from a process which runs
nightly:
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 1 Intra-query parallelism caused
your server command (process ID #55) to deadlock. Rerun the query without
intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).
I read KB 837983 "You may receive error message 8650 when you run a query
that uses intra-query parallelism" and KB 315662 "FIX: Parallel query may
encounter undetected deadlock with itself" referenced by that article, as
well as the article mentioned by a MVP in this group in a message dated
07/26/2007. I also read up on Degrees of parallelism in BOL. What isn't
clear to me is, what exactly is meant by parallel "query" execution? Is this
referring to a single "query" being executed by multiple threads
simultaneously, or multiple threads executing separate "queries" (even
though the statements may be identical)? If it is the former then I see no
reason why I shouldn't go ahead and disable it, since only this one process
which runs after hours has generated the error. If it is the latter, then
that would seem to indicate that disabling parallel query execution
effectively would make my four CPU server a one CPU server. What I have read
seems to suggest the former, but nowhere is it stated outright. Can anyone
clear this up for me?

Intra-query parallelism

I'm saw this error for the first time this AM from a process which runs
nightly:
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 1 Intra-query parallelism caused
your server command (process ID #55) to deadlock. Rerun the query without
intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).
I read KB 837983 "You may receive error message 8650 when you run a query
that uses intra-query parallelism" and KB 315662 "FIX: Parallel query may
encounter undetected deadlock with itself" referenced by that article, as
well as the article mentioned by a MVP in this group in a message dated
07/26/2007. I also read up on Degrees of parallelism in BOL. What isn't
clear to me is, what exactly is meant by parallel "query" execution? Is this
referring to a single "query" being executed by multiple threads
simultaneously, or multiple threads executing separate "queries" (even
though the statements may be identical)? If it is the former then I see no
reason why I shouldn't go ahead and disable it, since only this one process
which runs after hours has generated the error. If it is the latter, then
that would seem to indicate that disabling parallel query execution
effectively would make my four CPU server a one CPU server. What I have read
seems to suggest the former, but nowhere is it stated outright. Can anyone
clear this up for me?Intra-query parallelism uses multiple threads to service a single query.
You can just add the OPTION (MAXDOP 1) to your SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
statement to suppress parallelism for that one query.
--
Tom
----
Thomas A. Moreau, BSc, PhD, MCSE, MCDBA, MCITP, MCTS
SQL Server MVP
Toronto, ON Canada
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Tom.Moreau
"Ron Hinds" <billg@.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OViL%23ns2HHA.4184@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
I'm saw this error for the first time this AM from a process which runs
nightly:
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 1, Line 1 Intra-query parallelism caused
your server command (process ID #55) to deadlock. Rerun the query without
intra-query parallelism by using the query hint option (maxdop 1).
I read KB 837983 "You may receive error message 8650 when you run a query
that uses intra-query parallelism" and KB 315662 "FIX: Parallel query may
encounter undetected deadlock with itself" referenced by that article, as
well as the article mentioned by a MVP in this group in a message dated
07/26/2007. I also read up on Degrees of parallelism in BOL. What isn't
clear to me is, what exactly is meant by parallel "query" execution? Is this
referring to a single "query" being executed by multiple threads
simultaneously, or multiple threads executing separate "queries" (even
though the statements may be identical)? If it is the former then I see no
reason why I shouldn't go ahead and disable it, since only this one process
which runs after hours has generated the error. If it is the latter, then
that would seem to indicate that disabling parallel query execution
effectively would make my four CPU server a one CPU server. What I have read
seems to suggest the former, but nowhere is it stated outright. Can anyone
clear this up for me?

Intra Query Error

Hi
I seem to be getting the following error, when running a SP which populates
a table:
***********************************
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 127, Line 1
Intra-query parallelism caused your server command (process ID #62) to deadl
ock. Rerun the query without intra-query parallelism by using the query hint
option (maxdop 1).
************************************
The SP is the following:
****************************************
*****************
ALTER PROCEDURE sp_crosstab_NOV AS
DECLARE @.Year VARCHAR(5)
DECLARE @.Month VARCHAR(20)
DECLARE @.select VARCHAR(8000)
DECLARE @.sumfunc VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @.pivot VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @.table VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @.sql VARCHAR(8000), @.delim VARCHAR(1)
SET @.Year = YEAR(GETDATE())
SET @.Month =MONTH(GETDATE()) - 1
SET @.select = 'INSERT INTO NUCosstab SELECT [Policy No], [Section Sequence],
Insured, [Effective Date], [Expiry Date], [Trans Code], Trade, [Reporting M
onth],[Reporting Year],SUM(GrossPremium) AS [Total Premium],
SUM(BrokerComm) AS [Broker Comm] , SUM(IPT) AS IPT FROM NUPremium WHERE [Re
porting Year] = ' + @.Year + ' AND [Reporting Month] = ' + @.Month + ' GROUP
BY [Policy No],[Section Sequence],Insured, [Effective Date],[Expiry Date],
[Trans Code], Trade, [Reporting Month],[Reporting Year]'
SET @.sumfunc = 'Sum(GrossPremium)'
SET @.pivot = '[Section Type Code]'
SET @.table = 'NUPremium'
TRUNCATE TABLE NUCosstab
SET NOCOUNT ON
SET ANSI_WARNINGS OFF
EXEC ('SELECT ' + @.pivot + ' AS pivot INTO ##pivot FROM ' + @.table + ' WHERE
1=2')
EXEC ('INSERT INTO ##pivot SELECT DISTINCT ' + @.pivot + ' FROM ' + @.table +
' WHERE '
+ @.pivot + ' Is Not Null')
SELECT @.sql='', @.sumfunc=STUFF(@.sumfunc, LEN(@.sumfunc), 1, ' END)' )
SELECT @.delim=CASE SIGN( CHARINDEX('char', data_type)+CHARINDEX('date', data
_type) )
WHEN 0 THEN '' ELSE '''' END
FROM tempdb.information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name='##pivot' AND column_name='pivot'
SELECT @.sql=@.sql + '''' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(100), pivot) + ''' = ' +
STUFF(@.sumfunc,CHARINDEX( '(', @.sumfunc )+1, 0, ' CASE ' + @.pivot + ' WHEN '
+ @.delim + CONVERT(VARCHAR(100), pivot) + @.delim + ' THEN ' ) + ', ' FROM ##
pivot
DROP TABLE ##pivot
SELECT @.sql=LEFT(@.sql, LEN(@.sql)-1)
SELECT @.select=STUFF(@.select, CHARINDEX(' FROM ', @.select)+1, 0, ', ' + @.sql
+ ' ')
EXEC (@.select)
SET ANSI_WARNINGS ON
*****************************
Any ideas?
Kind Regards
RickyHi Ricky
This article may help:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=837983
--
Jack Vamvas
________________________________________
__________________________
Receive free SQL tips - register at www.ciquery.com/sqlserver.htm
SQL Server Performance Audit - check www.ciquery.com/sqlserver_audit.htm
New article by Jack Vamvas - SQL and Markov Chains - www.ciquery.com/articles/art_
04.asp
"Ricky" <MSN.MSN.com> wrote in message news:%23DOlz4CIGHA.240@.TK2MSFTNGP11.p
hx.gbl...
Hi
I seem to be getting the following error, when running a SP which populates
a table:
***********************************
Server: Msg 8650, Level 13, State 127, Line 1
Intra-query parallelism caused your server command (process ID #62) to deadl
ock. Rerun the query without intra-query parallelism by using the query hint
option (maxdop 1).
************************************
The SP is the following:
****************************************
*****************
ALTER PROCEDURE sp_crosstab_NOV AS
DECLARE @.Year VARCHAR(5)
DECLARE @.Month VARCHAR(20)
DECLARE @.select VARCHAR(8000)
DECLARE @.sumfunc VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @.pivot VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @.table VARCHAR(100)
DECLARE @.sql VARCHAR(8000), @.delim VARCHAR(1)
SET @.Year = YEAR(GETDATE())
SET @.Month =MONTH(GETDATE()) - 1
SET @.select = 'INSERT INTO NUCosstab SELECT [Policy No], [Section Sequence],
Insured, [Effective Date], [Expiry Date], [Trans Code], Trade, [Reporting M
onth],[Reporting Year],SUM(GrossPremium) AS [Total Premium],
SUM(BrokerComm) AS [Broker Comm] , SUM(IPT) AS IPT FROM NUPremium WHERE [Re
porting Year] = ' + @.Year + ' AND [Reporting Month] = ' + @.Month + ' GROUP
BY [Policy No],[Section Sequence],Insured, [Effective Date],[Expiry Date],
[Trans Code], Trade, [Reporting Month],[Reporting Year]'
SET @.sumfunc = 'Sum(GrossPremium)'
SET @.pivot = '[Section Type Code]'
SET @.table = 'NUPremium'
TRUNCATE TABLE NUCosstab
SET NOCOUNT ON
SET ANSI_WARNINGS OFF
EXEC ('SELECT ' + @.pivot + ' AS pivot INTO ##pivot FROM ' + @.table + ' WHERE
1=2')
EXEC ('INSERT INTO ##pivot SELECT DISTINCT ' + @.pivot + ' FROM ' + @.table +
' WHERE '
+ @.pivot + ' Is Not Null')
SELECT @.sql='', @.sumfunc=STUFF(@.sumfunc, LEN(@.sumfunc), 1, ' END)' )
SELECT @.delim=CASE SIGN( CHARINDEX('char', data_type)+CHARINDEX('date', data
_type) )
WHEN 0 THEN '' ELSE '''' END
FROM tempdb.information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name='##pivot' AND column_name='pivot'
SELECT @.sql=@.sql + '''' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(100), pivot) + ''' = ' +
STUFF(@.sumfunc,CHARINDEX( '(', @.sumfunc )+1, 0, ' CASE ' + @.pivot + ' WHEN '
+ @.delim + CONVERT(VARCHAR(100), pivot) + @.delim + ' THEN ' ) + ', ' FROM ##
pivot
DROP TABLE ##pivot
SELECT @.sql=LEFT(@.sql, LEN(@.sql)-1)
SELECT @.select=STUFF(@.select, CHARINDEX(' FROM ', @.select)+1, 0, ', ' + @.sql
+ ' ')
EXEC (@.select)
SET ANSI_WARNINGS ON
*****************************
Any ideas?
Kind Regards
Ricky